We currently have dot-com, dot-net, dot-gov, dot-org, and even dot-biz; next up is dot-eco. Two groups are currently going toe-to-toe in who is going to manage this new internet domain suffix One group is in B.C., Vancouver, called Big Room , the other is located in Los Angeles, called Dot Eco. Do we really need a dot-eco domain? Nonetheless this will not only serve as a marketing tool for companies who wish to show their “green” side, but hopefully act as a fundraising tool as well. Revenues generated from the sell of these domain names will go to environmental causes.
There is a small catch. Once this new domain is launched, they say in 2010, not just anyone will be able to register for it. In other words, there will be a set of eligibility standards applicants would have to meet. One idea is having applicants set up a profile outlining their sustainability initiatives. But this leaves the question, who will verify this?
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Both companies have strong supporters.



















November 18th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
Hi Arcadia,
Great question, that’s why we’ve created and posted an accuracy and accountability policy here for public comment: http://doteco.info/policy/public-comment/accuracy-and-accountability-second-draft what do you think? Are we on the right track?
Best, Jacob.
November 20th, 2009 at 2:46 am
Sign me up when they get a .eco!!!
November 23rd, 2009 at 6:40 pm
Hi Jacob,
Thanks for your response. I think the page for accountability (the link you provided) is a great idea!